Versionsgeschichte von „Forum / Gästebuch“

Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche

Diff Auswahl: Die Boxen der gewünschten Versionen markieren und 'Enter' drücken oder den Button unten klicken/alt-v.
Legende: (Aktuell) = Unterschied zur aktuellen Version, (Letzte) = Unterschied zur vorherigen Version, M = Kleine Änderung

(Latest | Earliest) Zeige () () (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:45, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.52 (Diskussion)(1.064 Byte) (In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:44, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(1.076 Byte) (In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:44, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.51 (Diskussion)(936 Byte) (Take me for example. I could support Bachman, Cain, Palin, or Santorum. in no particular order. Others would choose fewer plus Paul., http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33746768 amy smart nude)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:43, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(985 Byte) (Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:29, 3. Apr 201272.46.134.138 (Diskussion)(346 Byte) (It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:17, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.049 Byte) (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:13, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(990 Byte) (Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:12, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(1.018 Byte) (I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was..., http://taishwaryaraisexr.tum)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:10, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.51 (Diskussion)(1.342 Byte) (I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 19:10, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.52 (Diskussion)(1.202 Byte) (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:59, 3. Apr 201272.46.134.138 (Diskussion)(151 Byte) (Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:49, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.177 Byte) (Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:42, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(1.315 Byte) (Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:40, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(1.217 Byte) (I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:36, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.51 (Diskussion)(1.187 Byte) (One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly v)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:33, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.52 (Diskussion)(1.094 Byte) (ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:28, 3. Apr 201272.46.134.138 (Diskussion)(565 Byte) (That aside, I think that a multiple-contributor blog would give you support and provide some other perspectives. You could combine this with your ideas on coaching/ghostwriting and work with 'intern')
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:20, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.166 Byte) (O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him., http://www.esnips.com/displayimage.php?pid=33754885 mega)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:10, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(983 Byte) (I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 18:09, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(1.049 Byte) (In doing this blog and thinking about this stuff, have you ever had any ideas for what kinds of tools (software, that is) that people could use to do things like share creative ideas in groups, create)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:57, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.52 (Diskussion)(929 Byte) (In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spread)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:56, 3. Apr 201272.46.134.138 (Diskussion)(430 Byte) (It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:50, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.119 Byte) (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:38, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(1.568 Byte) (Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:37, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(1.301 Byte) (Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:26, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.51 (Diskussion)(1.207 Byte) (The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:25, 3. Apr 201272.46.134.138 (Diskussion)(348 Byte) (I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be as)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:22, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.52 (Diskussion)(1.344 Byte) (It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting yo)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:20, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.347 Byte) (Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:06, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(1.292 Byte) (And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 17:05, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(1.114 Byte) (I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:52, 3. Apr 201272.46.134.138 (Diskussion)(220 Byte) (The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:50, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.291 Byte) (I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:49, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.51 (Diskussion)(1.012 Byte) (Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:46, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.52 (Diskussion)(1.153 Byte) (I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinion)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:33, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(1.121 Byte) (That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize.)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:33, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(1.351 Byte) (It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:21, 3. Apr 201272.46.134.138 (Diskussion)(220 Byte) (The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:19, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.306 Byte) (Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:14, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.51 (Diskussion)(1.180 Byte) (ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ug)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:10, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.52 (Diskussion)(1.184 Byte) (I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:02, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(1.149 Byte) (I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 16:00, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(1.377 Byte) (I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediac)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 15:49, 3. Apr 201272.46.134.138 (Diskussion)(233 Byte) (What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 15:49, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.378 Byte) (It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" � I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evange)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 15:38, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.51 (Diskussion)(942 Byte) (It's entirely possible that I copied that individual number across incorrectly (and that the index was correct), but when I did the query just then it returned a Technorati Rank of 37, so as you say t)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 15:34, 3. Apr 201246.21.144.52 (Diskussion)(1.112 Byte) (The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 15:29, 3. Apr 201272.46.128.10 (Diskussion)(1.146 Byte) (I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 15:25, 3. Apr 2012208.66.75.162 (Diskussion)(1.021 Byte) (Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the i)
  • (Aktuell | Vorherige) 15:17, 3. Apr 2012208.66.72.114 (Diskussion)(1.046 Byte) (What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT)
(Latest | Earliest) Zeige () () (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
'Persönliche Werkzeuge
Namensräume
Varianten
Aktionen
Navigation
Werkzeuge